In this post
Why do professions need a body of knowledge?
Without one, every employer, trainer and exam writer defines the work differently. A published standard lets a hiring manager, a student and an examiner mean the same thing when they say “a competent practitioner”, and it gives disagreements a document to be settled against.
What does a good body of knowledge contain?
It states its scope, so readers know what the field covers and leaves out. It divides the work into domains, lists the tasks in each, and names the knowledge those tasks need. It defines its terms, cites its references, and describes how it is revised.
Is a body of knowledge the same as a certification?
No. The body of knowledge is the standard, and a certification is an assessment of a person against it. Keeping the two separate matters, because the people who set a standard should not simply grade their own training. IICTP publishes its standard openly as the TPBOK™, and its credentials assess people against it.
Who writes and updates one?
Usually a panel of practitioners and educators, working in the open where possible and revising on a schedule. A good one publishes drafts for public review, records what changed between versions, and says who is accountable for it.
How should a practitioner use one?
Read the domain descriptions to see where your work sits, then use the task statements as a checklist for gaps. Follow the references when you need depth, and check the revision date, because a standard that is not updated goes stale.
Sources and further reading
- IICTP. TPBOK™, the Technical Practitioner Body of Knowledge. iictp.org/standards/tpbok.
IICTP is an independent technical credentialing body.